Welcome to the blog dedicated to advancing all forms of rail in the city of Evansville. Whether it's high speed rail, light rail, freight rail, commuter rail, cable cars, maglev rail, or even personal rapid transit, rail is Evansville's future. Please send all questions and comments to JordanBaer1@gmail.com.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

It Makes Financial Sense To Build High Speed Rail Not I-69

(photo credit: careerguide.com)

Unlike roads, which most are untolled and take in zero revenue to offset their high costs, high speed rail has proven over and over that it will either offset its costs or turn a steady profit. Here are some examples...

Amtraks ACELA covers it's own costs...
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/business-brains/amtrak-8217s-acela-turns-10-all-eyes-on-new-high-speed-rail-initiatives/12483

Spain's AVE covers it's cost...
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/16/science/earth/16train.html

Russia's profits...
http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/11/russian-hsr-high-ridership-big-profits/

Taiwan's profits...
http://www.cahsrblog.com/2010/06/taiwan-hsr-generates-operating-profit/

On the flip side, I-69 has been exposed for its inability to be financially viable. Back in 1999, before INDOT admitted that the cost of the interstate from Evansville to Indianapolis would be $3.31 billion not $750 million, an independent firm pegged each job created by I-69 to cost $1.56 million...

http://www.commonsensei69.org/documents/I69UICRpt01-00-99.pdf

Wouldn't it be nice if we actually got something for the several billion dollars we are getting ready to spend on our infrastructure to Indianapolis? Wouldn't it be nice if we had to buy less land because our rails our almost 1/3rd the size of our interstates? And wouldn't it be nice if we could tap into the Bloomington and Indianapolis markets for goods and services that could easily be here in less than an hour on a 220 mph train than a 70 mph car or truck?

High speed rail does all of that. And for these reasons, and so many more, we need to build RAILS NOT ROADS!

(photo credit: Dailyplunge.com)

Sunday, June 12, 2011

A Vibrant US Train Industry Would Employ More People Than Car Makers Do Now

The Infrastructurist

By Yonah Freemark

http://www.infrastructurist.com/2009/05/19/a-vibrant-us-train-industry-would-employ-more-people-than-car-makers-do-now/



Everyone knows America’s passenger train system is pathetic by international standards, so President Obama’s $13 billion commitment to build a national high-speed rail network has come as a wonderful surprise.

It also raises the question of whether a reinvigorated rail industry could, with the car industry and several airlines drifting into bankruptcy, be the next great hope for keeping people employed in this country?

Though the U.S. is the world’s largest economy, the market for passenger rail vehicles and services has shrunk dramatically over the past several decades. European and Asian countries have invested heavily in expanding their rail offerings but Washington has done little more than keep national operator Amtrak on life support. As a result, rail accounts for only 0.3% of total transportation usage in the U.S., compared to 6% in the U.K., 10% in Austria, and 27% in Japan. Because of the lack of adequate train services, automobiles and airplanes provide the only medium-to-long distance commuting choice for the majority of Americans.

This has meant that US companies have largely missed out on participating in a major global industry. The competitive market for rail manufacturing and services in Europe accounted for more than 20 billion euros in 2005. The market in the Nafta zone of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico was only one-quarter as large, even though the two areas have equivalent populations.

There has been some increased recent investment in urban rail networks in the US: there are several foreign factories that make vehicles for commuter and light rail systems in stateside facilities. But there are no plants making intercity trains, as Amtrak hasn’t ordered new rolling stock in a decade and no passenger rail manufacturers are headquartered in America.

In the world passenger rail market, three companies currently dominate: the Canadian Bombardier, the French Alstom, and the German Siemens. In Germany, railway manufacturers collectively employ 45,000 individuals who produce new trainsets for large markets in that nation and abroad. Bombardier alone provides jobs for 34,000 people in the rail industry.

But none of these companies employs the mammoth 200,000-plus person workforce of a major auto company like Ford or GM.

Even in fully-developed rail markets such as those in Europe, train production doesn’t create as many jobs as making cars. Yet rail vehicles, unlike automobiles, need a staff to operate them, and that’s where a passenger rail industry could prove its value in creating new jobs.

France’s TGV high-speed trains, which criss-cross that country, carried 100 million people in 2008, and the national rail company employs about 200,000 people (that number includes people working on commuter trains). France is 1/5th the size of the U.S. in population.

One can extrapolate: an equivalent American rail network could transport 500 million passengers a year on fast rail and provide jobs for one million people operating trains, maintaining track, and serving customers. There are about as many people working in motor vehicle and part manufacturing in the U.S. today. A vibrant rail industry would mostly be a service-oriented one, rather than a manufacturing one.

The U.S. isn’t close to providing anything of the sort today: Amtrak’s 18,000 employees served only 29 million passengers in 2008. It’s hard to imagine an $8 billion dollar investment from Washington being enough to stimulate the 20-fold expansion of a transportation sector, but it’s a start.

Perhaps America should look for an example in its success in transporting freight by rail. Since 1980, the railroad industry has invested $420 billion of its own funds for locomotives, rail cars, tracks, bridges, and tunnels, and today freight companies like CSX and Norfolk Southern manage more than 140,000 miles of track and transport more goods than do truckers. More than 180,000 people work in the field.

There’s no reason equivalent success couldn’t arise from a passenger rail industry.

Yonah Freemark is an independent researcher currently working in France on comparative urban development as part of a Gordon Grand Fellowship from Yale University, from which he graduated in May 2008 with a BA in architecture. He writes about transportation and land use issues for The Transport Politic and The Infrastructurist.

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Japan Flashes Green Signal for Maglev Train Line

May 30, 2011

Read More: http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/may2...-05-30-01.html

The Japanese government has signaled Central Japan Railway "to proceed with construction" of its magnetically levitated train line between Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka. On May 27 Transport Minister Akihiro Ohata directed the company, known as JR Tokai, to move forward with the 9 trillion yen project that has been in development since the 1970s.

- In July 2009, Japan's Maglev Technological Practicality Evaluation Committee of Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism validated that the superconducting maglev trains are ready for revenue service. "The technologies of the Superconducting Maglev have been established comprehensively and systematically, which makes it possible to draw up detailed specifications and technological standards for revenue service," the committee said.

- Running at 505 kilometers (313 miles) per hour, the maglev trains will cover the distance between Tokyo and Nagoya in about 40 minutes. When the line is completed, maglev trains will travel the 514 km (320 mile) distance between Tokyo and Osaka in 67 minutes. The maglev trains are expected to start carrying passengers between Tokyo and Nagoya in 2027 and between Tokyo and Osaka in 2045.

- The ministry told JR Tokai to build the maglev infrastructure on an almost straight route, using underground tunnels to pass beneath the mountains that lie between Tokyo and Nagoya. In December, JR Tokai expects to begin an environmental assessment of the route running through the Akaishi Mountains, northwest of Mount Fuji. The company says construction is planned to start in 2014.

- Much of the project's 9 trillion yen budget is needed to construct the tunnels through which the trains will run for more than 60 percent of the entire line. Plans call for the tunnels to be built deep underground for a total of 100 km (60 miles) in the Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka areas.

.....


JR Tokai maglev train in the Yamanashi test line station


Monday, June 6, 2011

Europe To Open First Solar-Powered Railway Tunnel

Europe to open first solar-powered railway tunnel

05 Jun 2011

By David Millward

The Telegraph

Read More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tr...ay-tunnel.html


The 2.1 mile-long tunnel will form part of the Paris-Amsterdam high speed rail link. Electricity generated from the 50,000 solar panels will provide the electricity used to power the 186 mph trains as they pass underneath. The panels, which are being built by a Belgian solar power company, Enfinity, will £12.6 million. They will cover an area equivalent to eight football pitches and apart from the trains, will also power for Antwerp. The panels will generate an estimate 3,300 MWh of electricity per year, equivalent to the average annual electricity consumption of approximately 950 families.

- In the United States ac campaign has been launched for a "sun-powered bullet train" travelling at 200mph between Tucson and Phoenix, Arizona. Meanwhile in Italy, the EU has been funding a train with solar panels on the roof, which are used to provide electricity for the carriages' air conditioning system. The French have also been looking at the technology using solar panels to power the lighting and air conditioning on a train in Poitou Charentes.

.....

Friday, June 3, 2011

Take A Look At Our High Speed Rail Region

(photo credit: Midwest High Speed Rail Association)

Here in Evansville, if we are ever fortunate enough to convince our local and regional leaders to pursue high speed rail, we will be in the Midwest Regional Rail System. Here are some great links to introduce you to the network...

http://www.midwesthsr.org/splash.html

http://www.midwesthsr.org/2011-economic-study
http://www.connectthemidwest.com/
http://www.dot.state.wi.us/projects/state/docs/mwrri-regional-brochure.pdf
http://www.indianahighspeedrail.org/

As you can see, Evansville is the only major region in the entire Midwest that isn't planning for high speed rail. We need to change that. We need to make sure...

- We have a clean environment
- We have an affordable transportation system
- We have a safe transportation system
- We have a fast transportation system
- We have a transportation system free from the shackles of oil
- we have a transportation system that produces jobs for everyone

High speed rail does all of the above. Other cities and states, including our very own state of Indiana are planning to build high speed rail. We need to do the same!

(photo credit: treehugger.com)

Thursday, June 2, 2011

All Aboard!

(photo credit: electronici9.com)

After many emails from you the viewers of my other two blogs SaveRobertsStadium.blogspot.com & EvansvilleMovingForward.blogspot.com to create a rail only blog, I have decided to do just that. For 50 + years, there has been a pall over Evansville. This pall is mainly due to the terrible decision our local leaders made to rip up our light rail and trolley systems and replace them with roads.

If Evansville is ever going to lift the pall, we must join the rest of the world in the 21st century with our transportation. It is time to shed the old ways of the automobile and get on the rails of tomorrow.

Unlike my Save Roberts Stadium blog where I support both the new arena and Roberts Stadium, I will taking the position of supporting high speed rail, light rail, freight rail, commuter rail, cable car rail, maglev rail, and personal rapid transit but will be opposing the construction of I-69. While many believe that high speed rail and I-69 would co-exist, this simply isn't true for a number of reasons...

1. There isn't enough money to go around.
2. I-69 will destroy any environmental benefits we will gain with high speed rail.
3. High speed rail is best served by using the land adjacent to the existing track's Right-of-Way.
4. Building I-69 encourages Southern Indiana to remain shackled to the automobile.
5. High speed rail needs to be in the planning stages now, not when I-69 is completed.

I can't thank you the viewers of my blogs for all of your support. When I started Evansville Moving Forward and Save Roberts Stadium, I never dreamed how popular they would be. Although building rails in Evansville will take a lot more time than it will to save Roberts Stadium or get Evansville Moving Forward, I believe that if you the viewers support this blog as much as you have supported the other two we will be successful.

Evansville has a lot of work ahead of it to bring rails of all kinds to town, so let's get to work!

(photo credit: vistadome.com)